CISPA: The End of “Our” Internet?

Tomorrow is a very important day in American politics. A landmark amendment to the National Security Act of 1947 has been pushed through the House of Representatives and is set for a rushed vote in the Senate.  CISPA (Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, H.R. 3523) is an amendment that would update the law to include the ability to govern the sharing of specific information between private companies and the government that is deemed a “cyber threat.”

If SOPA/PIPA was about censorship, CISPA is about privacy.

I’m curious though, what does the amendment define as a “cyber threat?”

“Information in the possession of an element of the intelligence community directly pertaining to a vulnerability of, or threat to, a system or network of a government or private entity, including information pertaining to the protection of a system or network from either ‘efforts to degrade, disrupt, or destroy such system or network’; or ‘theft or misappropriation of private or government information, intellectual property or personally identifiable information.”

So really anything could be a “cyber threat” right? Just wonderful.

Well, why should you care? Because it’s legislation that can, and will have implications on our society, government, future laws, and most importantly you. This little provision would pretty much nullify existing privacy laws and give corporations legal immunity for sharing your information and communication with the government. In its current form, CISPA affects our fundamental rights to privacy and freedom of expression, and in the name of “national security,” our government has proven time and time again that it will continue to cater to corporate manipulation and special interest groups at the cost of the average American.

What CISPA effectively says is that the 4th Amendment does’t apply online. Also the government structured the bill which exempts CISPA from the Freedom of Information Act. The legislation is now currently tucked inside of Senate bill S.2105, which has bipartisan congressional support, and will likely pass without a majority of the public even knowing it exists.

But it gets better. The meetings were all held in secret too…

Oh, and did I mention that the amendment is terribly vague when it comes to the limits on how and when the government may (will) monitor a private individual’s personal information? Text messages? Check. Emails? Check? All shared freely between corporations and the government.

Here’s a good one: What company just went public in the stock market and has almost a billion subscribed users? If you said Facebook, well you were right, or you looked ahead and saw what I wrote (smarty pants).

Facebook will spy on you and your friends. It will gather all your “private” information, allow the government to use it anytime against you, and for whatever reason it sees fit. Does the government need to know what you did this morning when you woke up? Not really. What about the conversation in messenger you had about the new Game of Thrones episode? Doubt it. So why does the government need to be constantly checking what websites you go to, what you say, and when you do it? Good question.

Terrorists.

Yes, we apparently need to protect ourselves from… the terrorists. Again.

* “If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
- George Washington

So, are you starting to get a little pissed off yet? Unfortunately there isn’t really anything you can do now but sit and wait. It looks like it’s going to pass in the Senate, and President Obama will sign it, so welcome to your future prison cell.

For future reference, here’s a list of companies that supported CISPA and their “letters of support.” ∞

AT&T
Boeing
BSA
Business Roundtable
CSC
COMPTEL
CTIA – The Wireless Association
Cyber, Space and Intelligence Association
Edison Electric
EMC
Exelon
Facebook
The Financial Services Roundtable
IBM
Independent Telephone & Telecommunications Alliance
Information Technology Industry Council
Intel
Internet Security Alliance
Lockheed Martin
Microsoft
National Cable & Telecommunications Association
NDIA
Oracle
Symantec
TechAmerica
US Chamber of Commerce
US Telecom – The Broadband Association
Verizon

CISPA Monster

About these ads

10 responses to “CISPA: The End of “Our” Internet?

    • This is purely a political move by Google. They played it smart and never released a statement on the situation, effectively keeping the negative attention at a distance. The last thing they wanted from this situation was to piss off their largest demographic and deal with a bunch of bad press.

      At the end of the day however, it probably wouldn’t have mattered what they said. If by some miracle CISPA fails to pass, Google may come out and join the winning team, but if it passes, I doubt you’ll hear anything from them.

    • I always enjoy a little discussion… First off, the Washington Post article is from April, more than a month ago. It’s old news, especially from “Reddit” standards. The name of my article is called CISPA: The End of “Our” Internet, not the “literal” end of the internet. Also if you read the whole article, you would see that… “The legislation is now currently tucked inside of Senate bill S.2105, which has bipartisan congressional support, and will likely pass without a majority of the public even knowing it exists.” Finally, if we take into account Obama’s past promises, ahem (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012) then we know that he isn’t against changing his mind at the last moment. Here’s a quote from him directly about the NDAA bill: “…signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation, and prosecution of suspected terrorists.” This is all about politics, not specifically President Obama. If I’m wrong then you can message me back with what an idiot I am, okay? ∞

  1. As stated (however sarcastically) in the above article, the government has no need or interest in monitoring the private emails, texts, or facebook profiles of the average citizen, much less the personel to moniter said sources with any type of consistency. The only cyber-dialogue that will be monitered will be that belonging to individual parties already marked a threat/suspicion by the US government. Now, I dont know about you guys… but I am pretty sure my name is not on that list. Unless you are curled up in an underground bunker in your backyard, stacking up crates of plutonium, you can rest assured your most recent “ZOMG I totally love Taylor Swift!” post is safe from censorship. The only people who should truly be concerned about the implications of online Homeland Security measures are the ones who, as we speak, are securing the final sticks of dynamite to their ski vests and twittering in attack codes: “Alpha Alpha Suddam Megatron. Jackie Kennedy’s panties are now on fire. I repeat: Jackie Kennedy’s panties are now on fire.”

  2. This is my first time we visit here. I discovered so many entretaining things in your blog, particularly its dialogue. From the tons of remarks on your articles, I suppose I am not the only one getting all of the leisure here! Keep up the great work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s